A Pair Of Public Enemies

Two pictures, the first is Lloyd Blankfein, the head of Goldman Sachs. This is what the Occupy Wall Street people would like to happen. I can't blame them because he is a criminal of the highest order.
Second picture." Hi Mr Gaddafi, you're my new best friend." I wonder if Tony went to his funeral. There is no difference between Lloyd and Tony. They are major pawns in the New World Order. I wouldn't urinate on them if they were on fire.
Till next time.

New World Order. 1

It is time we all faced up to what is really going on in the world. The first thing everyone should understand is that the various prime ministers, presidents, including Cameron, Obama, Sarkozy etc. are not in charge of their various countries. Neither are the major shareholders of the major banks like Bank of England, J.P.Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup etc. They answer to people even higher up in the pecking order. The family whose name turns up at every turn of my research is Rothschild. They control over half the wealth of the entire planet. Also, at the same level of influence, are the various royal families in the world, especially our own. For instance, the queen is the major shareholder in BP. The amount of money it generates for the royal bank account is enormous. Prince Charles estate of the duchy of Cornwall generates an income of £18 million per year into his bank account. The royal families of europe as is well known, are all related. They have been inbreeding for centuries and even William and his wife are indeed distant relations. The Queen, in fact owns all of England. Every single piece of land is owned by her. The income that is generated by people paying the numerous property taxes could run a small country. She, however, only owns Balmoral, Holyrood House in Scotland, because the law in Scotland is different. The monarch is titled King or Queen of Scots, the people, not the land. As far as I am aware, there is no law of trespass in Scotland. If I find out different I will post it here.
Getting back to the main issue, wehen we vote in elections, we think we have a choice. We don't. Both parties are run by the same people and they are run by the Rothschild family. It is the same in the USA, Democrat or Republican, both the same. As to the ultimate goal of the elite, that is easy to see. First of all, they want the planet divided into regions. We already have the EU, and we have the US, Canada and Mexico secretly negotiating a treaty which will go on to include central and south america. The Soviet Union was deliberately disbanded by the global elite to allow an Asian union to form. Included in all this is, eventually, is a one world digital currency. Take note of the word digital. At the moment, if we don't have a credit card, we can pay cash. Imagine what would happen if currency was made digital only. The populations spending could be controlled by central government. Did I say could? I actually meant would. I'm getting ahead of myself. After the planet is divided into regions, the process that will lead to a one world government will start. We will already have a planetary army whose only allegiance will be to the then equivalent of the UN, which, by the way, is already controlled by the global elite. We now come to the endgame, the ultimate goal of what is already being called the New World Order. I don't know if everyone has heard of the term Eugenics. In it's basest form, it is population control. This has nothing to do with an environmental policy. It has everything to do with the elite thinking that the world is too crowded for them and some of us have to go. When I say some of us, I mean that they want to get rid or to put it bluntly, exterminate up to 98% of us. You might think I'm being a bit dramatic, but if, for instance you research a term "Useless eaters" you will realise that we are in danger.
I have skipped quite a lot of the detail of the above agenda, but I will read through and I will post more detail in future posts.
Till next time.

It's all happening.

Well, it looks as if the brown stuff is about to hit the fan. That warmongering fool who is in charge of that rogue terrorist state of Israel, Netanyahoo, is going to start WW3 by authorising a strike on Iran. Obama, Soetoro, or whatever his name is will stand by it's ally and of course our, the UK's, mentally defective leader, Cameron will want in on the act. If ever the term "The lunatics have taken over the asylum" was appropriate, it is most certainly, now. As private Fraser used to say in "Dads Army" We're doomed"
Back in reality, I don't think it will be a case of doom. It will however, be a close run thing. The Cuban missile crisis was bad, this has the potential to be a whole lot worse. The global elite, whoever they are, hang on a minute, we know very well who they are. The Rothschild family. Are engineering this whole event and it will go as far as they want it to and I don't think total destruction is their ultimate goal just yet. That comes later.
Next, I see that the Occupy Glasgow folk have come to an amicable agreement with Glasgow City Council to move the protest. I don't know where yet, but I hope it will be in a prominent place instead of Glasgow Green which is a bit out of the way.
Well that is about all for the time being. I hope to be a wee bit more prolific with the blog in future but I also have a youtube channel which I make videos for and that takes up time as well. Till next time.

Fabian link to Saif al-Gaddafi.

While doing a bit of research on the Fabian Society, I came accross a piece of info on Saif al-Islam Gaddafi. It turned out that he attended the London School of Economics which is a Fabian Society dominated institution. Further to that, in 2009 he was a guest of Lord Mandleson at Waddesdon Manor which turns out to be the home of the financier Jacob Rothschild, the fourth Baron Rothschild. Nathaniel Phillip Rothschild was also present at this weekend meeting. What was discussed I haven't been able to find out yet. Later in 2009, Nathaniel was present at Saif's 37th birthday celebrations in Montenegro. Some people would not think that these meetings were in any way sinister, but i believe differently. The Rothschild don't do anything that does not directly or indirectly benefit the family, and why would Peter Mandleson invite someone with suspected links to terrorism to the UK? More research necessary.
The other thing I happened upon was that on August 9th 2008, Dr John Reid MP the then home secretary made a speech to the DEMOS think tank conference in which he said, "Britons may have to modify their notion of freedom." The reason given was to help fight the war on terror. I wonder what he meant by "modify"
At present, i am doing a bit of research into "DEMOS" and I will blog on it at a later date.

Sky News Ad.

While watching TV last night, I saw an advert for Sky News. It was a female reporter who was supposed to be in Libya. The pictures of a young boy writhing about in pain on a stretcher was distressing, but, after the ad had ended, I thought to myself, "I didn't see any evidence of trauma or injuries or any blood anywhere. I waited for the next commercial break and on it came again. The reporter was being filmed outside in front of a wall which looked like any other wall you would have seen anywhere. There were no marks or bullet holes anywhere. The street was not littered with debris of any kind, in fact it was cleaner than the street outside my house. I watched carefully, the little boy and still couldn't find any evidence that he had been injured in any way. Another thing about the reporter was that she was not wearing any body armour whatsoever. Every reporter I have seen in Libya has been well protected with a helmet and body armour.
I have been hearing regular accusations towards the BBC and Sky that some of their news reports have been staged and have not come from the places they were supposed to come from. My opinion of the commercial is that it is a totally staged event. I personally do not trust the mainstream media. I, in fact always do my own research on most of the important news stories, and make my own mind up about them. I urge you all to do the same. Question everything.

Qaddafi.

A lot of people might not like what i am about to say, but I have to be true to myself.
The butchery of Qaddafi is an absolute disgrace and an affront to justice. The mainstream media are having a feeding frenzy over the horrific pictures of his body. This is something that should be abhorrent to all decent human beings.
On to his death. Some people are doubtful that the body shown was actually Qaddafi. Steven Lendman, a well respected author and blogger, has expressed doubts as to whether the body was actually Qaddafi. As far as I am concerned, there is still doubt. Like Saddam Hussein, doubles are a possibility.
And so to the aftermath. For all his faults, and they were many, Qaddafi invested in huge engineering projects that benefited the people of Libya. ie. Irrigation, Fresh water treatment plants, free education and health care for all, and more. NATO, in it's wisdom bombed it all into extinction. Now, it will all have to be rebuilt, and who is going to pay for it? The people of course, which will lead to a never ending cycle of massive personal debt. I fear they will regret inviting NATO in for a long time to come. I'm disgusted with the whole thing and the likes of Cameron, Obama, Sarkozy and Hilary Clinton should be ashamed of themselves. At the end of the day I don't think that taking him alive was even considered. If he had faced a trial, by the end of it, he would not have been the only leader on trial. The NATO governments will sleep easy tonight. Terrorists rule the west and we must fight to get rid of each and every one of them.

More complete nonsense from the tories.

I was watching BBC's breakfast news this morning and I heard, in my opinion, the biggest load of rubbish that I've heard for quite a while. They were talking about the state of Britain's housing market and how, at the moment thousands of adults are having to live with their parents because they can't afford to get on to the property ladder. An idea was proposed in which couples or even individuals would be "encouraged" to give up their houses if they were adjudged to be to big for them. In other words older people who have bought and paid for their houses are going to be emotionally blackmailed to sell their houses to let younger people buy them. Is this the start of forcing people who have often struggled to keep up with hugely inflated mortgage payments for twenty five years and more to move to inferior housing. This all started with Thatcher, who came up with the "Right to Buy" scheme, which was a good thing, as far as it went. The big mistake was that little or no replacement housing was built to provide affordable housing for people who didn't earn enough to buy houses, and so the housing boom was born. Older people are now about to be forced to work longer for reduced pensions, and now they are to be made to feel guilty because they are living in houses that are deemed too big for them. The proposal is to offer tax breaks to entice them to move. Stuff them. The government should cough up and build the affordable housing that is clearly needed.
I went to the Occupy Glasgow demo' on Saturday. The turn out was slightly disappointing but, from small acorns etc. It was a good day out and I met and talked to a lot of interesting people. The Police took a back seat and it passed with no incidents whatsoever. They are still there in George Square and look like staying for a while yet. I hope to be paying frequent visits and dropping off some much needed supplies. Donations of food, money, blankets, sleeping bags etc. will be gratefully accepted.
That's about all for the time being. I will be keeping a weathered eye on news of the Greek general strike today, which I hope passes peacefully. Bye for now.